Sam, I don't mean to interrupt the flow of this topic, but I do have a question and a comment.
I like this method because it gives us an organized way to play the game which I think is better than just throwing chips onto the board willy nilly. Using the completed street or corner is a good signal to end this attack and start another. Flat betting is obviously the best bet method assuming we have an advantage with our bet selection.
What I don't understand is what there is about this method that meets your criteria for a "reason" that it should/may work. If your statement about it being "fun to play" supersedes the "reason that it should work" then that's fine and easy to understand. I just want to make sure I'm not missing something else.
Having said that, here's a reason to play this per the wheel instead of the carpet and it should work as well and maybe even a little better. How long you would have to test both ways to determine this only God knows??
For wheel based, wait until we have 2 numbers hit with one un-hit number between them then bet the appropriate numbers on both ends. End the attack when we have a win or a segment of 3 numbers in a row that have hit anywhere on the wheel. (This would replicate the completing of a street). If we want a longer attack, we could quit when we have a win or a segment of 4 numbers in a row (replicating a corner) that have hit anywhere on the wheel.
The reasoning for playing it wheel based is that it would take advantage of dealer signature or wheel bias if either exists. That, I think, is a reason why this method should work.
What say you my friend?![:thumbsup:]( "Thumbs-up")
George
I like this method because it gives us an organized way to play the game which I think is better than just throwing chips onto the board willy nilly. Using the completed street or corner is a good signal to end this attack and start another. Flat betting is obviously the best bet method assuming we have an advantage with our bet selection.
What I don't understand is what there is about this method that meets your criteria for a "reason" that it should/may work. If your statement about it being "fun to play" supersedes the "reason that it should work" then that's fine and easy to understand. I just want to make sure I'm not missing something else.
Having said that, here's a reason to play this per the wheel instead of the carpet and it should work as well and maybe even a little better. How long you would have to test both ways to determine this only God knows??
For wheel based, wait until we have 2 numbers hit with one un-hit number between them then bet the appropriate numbers on both ends. End the attack when we have a win or a segment of 3 numbers in a row that have hit anywhere on the wheel. (This would replicate the completing of a street). If we want a longer attack, we could quit when we have a win or a segment of 4 numbers in a row (replicating a corner) that have hit anywhere on the wheel.
The reasoning for playing it wheel based is that it would take advantage of dealer signature or wheel bias if either exists. That, I think, is a reason why this method should work.
What say you my friend?
George